Working notes and research index

Jynx_84999 | Sadik Erisen

No. 6 Adversarial ML · OSINT · Supply chain Latest 08 August 2026

opsec · messaging · phishing

Carrier email-to-SMS gateways are still an open door


Every major US carrier runs an email-to-SMS gateway. Send mail to a number@carrier-domain address and it arrives on the handset as a text. The feature is decades old, predates anyone thinking hard about sender identity, and is still on.

I wrote up the mechanics with runnable PoCs in sms_gateway_poc: basic SMTP send, direct-to-MX delivery that skips a relay entirely, multi-carrier fanout, and From: header spoofing.

The interesting property is what the recipient sees. A message that arrived over SMTP renders in the same thread UI as one that arrived over SMS, with whatever sender string survived the gateway. The trust cues a person uses to judge a text message were designed around the carrier network, and this path routes around it while still landing in the same inbox.

There’s a defender-side scanner in the repo, which is the part I care about more. If you own a domain or a mail path, knowing whether your infrastructure can be used this way is a thing you can check rather than assume.

What I’m not claiming: this isn’t novel and it isn’t a vulnerability in the sense of something a carrier will patch. It’s a legacy interoperability feature behaving as designed, and that’s precisely why it’s durable. I also haven’t measured what fraction of messages survive carrier-side filtering, which varies by carrier and changes without notice. Treat the PoCs as demonstrating the path exists, not as a delivery rate.

Authorized testing only. Sending unsolicited messages through these gateways is illegal in most places regardless of how the plumbing works.